Correlación entre Hallazgos Clínicos, de Resonancia Magnética y Artroscópicos en el Diagnóstico de Rupturas Meniscales

Authors

  • Andrés Molina Creixell Christus Muguerza Hospital Alta Especialidad. Monterrey, NL, México
  • Luis Andrés Valverde Galindo Christus Muguerza Hospital Alta Especialidad. Monterrey, NL, México
  • Javier Meza Flores

Keywords:

meniscus, MRI, clinical examination, diagnostic accuracy

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of clinical examination and MRI in diagnosing meniscal tears, with diagnostic arthroscopy as the gold standard.
Material and methods: In this study, designed as a diagnostic test, 140 patients underwent clinical examination by a specialist followed by MRI, and the results were compared to the presence or absence of meniscal tears during diagnostic arthroscopy.
Results: The accuracy of clinical examination was 82.2% for lateral meniscal tears and 84.4% for medial meniscal tears. The accuracy of MRI was 63.3% for lateral meniscal tears and 70% for medial meniscal tears.
Conclusion: MRI can, in some cases, be unnecessary when there is a positive clinical examination for meniscal tears and should be reserved for cases when clinical examination is not conclusive.

Study type: Diagnostic test.
Level of evidence: II

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2020-07-01

How to Cite

1.
Molina Creixell A, Valverde Galindo LA, Meza Flores J. Correlación entre Hallazgos Clínicos, de Resonancia Magnética y Artroscópicos en el Diagnóstico de Rupturas Meniscales. RELART [Internet]. 2020 Jul. 1 [cited 2026 Jun. 17];27(02):47-50. Available from: https://revistarelart.com/index.php/revista/article/view/68

Issue

Section

Original article